Dear Lauded Knitting Pattern Designer:
Thank you for making such awesome patterns for me to knit. I thank you for your tireless creativity, the many nights you've spent staring at the ceiling vibrating with new ideas instead of sleeping. Thank you for knitting swatches, for knitting yarn you were assigned instead of yarn you'd chose for yourself, and for knitting sweaters in a size that fits your model instead of yourself. Because of your work, I am constantly inspired to make stuff and my project queue is longer than my life expectancy. I will never despair for something to knit. I want to make sure that you know how much I adore you before I ask this favour of you, if you would indulge me the time for a request.
I know a little about the ways and means of making your way as a designer. For example, if you publish through a publication like Twist Collective, there is a techincal staff in place to check your numbers, ask you about construction logistics, and generally ensure that knitters can reproduce the sweater as you intended.
But when you publish on your own, you have to hire that technical editor yourself, assuming you do hire a technical editor (and I do so hope that you do). You wouldn't dream of sending your pattern out into the world without that small quality assurance, right?
So here's the thing: since you spend the money and the extra time in making sure your pattern is perfect, why not credit your technical editor on your pattern?
Here's why I think this is a long overdue idea. As a knitter, it would be great to know that the patterns has in fact been technically edited, that someone besides the you has checked the numbers. Technical editors are the unsung heros of good patterns, and I know a bunch of designers who have whizes they turn to again and again, and I think it's time we knitters ask who they are.
Please undertand I'm not interested in disputing your creativity nor am I asking that you share your reputation for genius. I am merely suggesting that it is your responsibility to tell your customer that you are not only selling them a quality product, and that you owe a small amount of the quality to this person, who deserves a reputation for quality too. Before you know it, people will know at a glance that a pattern is a good value because it was technically edited by someone whose work they trust. I doubt technical editors will ever be the rock stars some of you designers are, but respect is a kind of quiet cousin to adulation, so why not foster it? Please, consider this a small gesture that would make a big impact.
Thanks so much.
Your devoted fan
julia
As a techy Knitter i so agree. Well done and stated.
Posted by: Marianne | December 20, 2010 at 03:29 PM
Excellent idea. It would also help the tech editors get more work, just as a popular pattern gets more work for a designer.
Posted by: Jennu | December 20, 2010 at 03:37 PM
Please, please, please! I have done some test-knitting of patterns that haven't yet been tech-edited. Even taking into account that the role of a test-knitter is to identify problems, I don't test-knit stuff I don't like, and it's still nice yarn. So, when numbers don't work out in really basic ways (e.g., waist shaping cutting into cable panels or blatantly wrong stitch counts given), well, I suppose I should just give thanks to all the editors who make sure that doesn't happen on patterns I've paid for!
Posted by: aliceq | December 20, 2010 at 03:45 PM
Can I second this ? Can not agree more. Just finished putting together a new book and our tech editor is/was...I don't even know superlatives that do her justice. Fabulous? Indispensable? The bestest? All of the above. And smart, too. (If you're reading this and you need a tech editor for any sewing or knitting or crafting patterns, give me a shout and I'll share the info)
Posted by: gale (she shoots sheep shots) | December 20, 2010 at 04:49 PM
Terrific idea! I'll definitely credit my tech editor on my next pattern because I read this post. She has saved me more than a few times from some very embarrassing (and stupid) errors.
Posted by: Beverly | December 20, 2010 at 05:57 PM
Here here!
Posted by: Emily | December 20, 2010 at 06:46 PM
Agreed! Good point.xcx
Posted by: Jen | December 20, 2010 at 07:23 PM
When I asked my favorite tech editor if she would like a credit she said she didn't want to take the chance that knitters would write to her for pattern support.
Posted by: Barbara | December 20, 2010 at 08:10 PM
After your tweet last week, I talked to my tech editor (she's Joeli Caparco)and asked if she would want her name included, and she was happy to have her name added to my Cranberry Capelet pattern, published a day or so after.
She edits my stuff both pre test knitting and after, and I can't imagine publishing without the help. She's kind of indespensible. I also like having the extra credit there for all to see, as it shows that I do take the extra step and that I go through all the steps to put a professional product out there.
So yes, and thanks Julia!
Posted by: thea | December 20, 2010 at 08:26 PM
. . . (I hit 'post' by mistake and meant to add:) I'm glad to see this reminder and will ask again in future.
Posted by: Barbara | December 20, 2010 at 09:27 PM
I would like this, too! I would love to have a selection of tech editors I know I can trust....I pick audio books to listen to partly by the readers (and found some great books I'd otherwise never have read!), not just the author, I'd do the same with knitting. A good tech editor will help sell a pattern! Rav would start adding that a searchable feature, and I'd find more designers to love!
Posted by: Colleen | December 20, 2010 at 09:52 PM
agreeeed! tech editors are important and amazing people. :)
Posted by: captainsharmie | December 20, 2010 at 10:49 PM
Agreed a very good point - I will do this on my next pattern :-)
Posted by: Janine | December 21, 2010 at 02:44 AM
I wholeheartedly agree!!
Posted by: Chery | December 21, 2010 at 05:18 AM
love this post so much! Without them we'd all be in tangles!
Posted by: margaux | December 21, 2010 at 10:09 AM
Thank you, Julia!
Posted by: Sandi Rosner | December 21, 2010 at 10:59 AM
Wonderful post! A few errors here and there are to be expected, but a pattern that gets dozens of 'fixes' after the fact is frustrating. I would definitely appreciate knowing that a pattern had a technical editor and (gasp) would probably even pay a bit more for that pattern!
Posted by: kim in oregon | December 21, 2010 at 11:19 AM
I agree whole heartedly and I am always assured when I see a pattern release, credit the tech editor. You might be interested in this post from the FairyGodKnitter. It finds some issues with a pattern from the Twist Collective and the resulting response. http://thejoyofsocks.typepad.com/my_weblog/2010/09/index.html
Posted by: Susanne | December 21, 2010 at 11:53 AM
Amen, amen! The time I have for knitting is limited and a pattern with glitches in it sure doesn't add to the R&R I am seeking with needles and yarn! I would buy patterns with a tech ed credit over ones without.
Posted by: Another Joan | December 21, 2010 at 01:44 PM
Interesting. Especially since the Kadril pattern I inquired about still hasn't been corrected and my request for a refund for the pattern purchase was never addressed.
Posted by: joan | December 21, 2010 at 04:21 PM
I agree wholeheartedly. I have a good friend who is a tech editor. She is sometimes not acknowledged in books!most patterns and books recognize the designer and photographer, why not the tech editor?
Posted by: Linda | December 22, 2010 at 09:11 AM
Woohoo! Ours is a weird, difficult, hard-to-explain, often-thankless job - it's nice to have someone speak out for us. Thanks, Julia!
Posted by: Nipper Jenn | December 28, 2010 at 02:02 PM
Thea recommended Joeli to me, and I've been crediting her in my patterns. She gives me the confidence to self-publish now.
Posted by: Kathleen | January 04, 2011 at 04:33 PM